The recent buzz surrounding the film “Dirty Vote,” directed by Dhandy Laksono and featuring legal experts Bivitri Susanti, Feri Amsari, and Zainal Arifin Mochtar, has sparked widespread discussions and debates. As an advocate for open dialogue and informed discourse, I seek to contribute to the ongoing conversation and promote a more educative discussion. At its core, my aim is to provide protection to the individuals involved in the making of this film, as safeguarding against potential criminalization is crucial in today’s landscape.
Dirty Vote: A Timely Masterpiece
It’s undeniable that everyone involved in the creation of the film “Dirty Vote” deserves appreciation for delivering a piece that educates the public in a methodical and academic manner, timed perfectly for maximum impact. The decision to release it on February 11, just ahead of the voting day on February 14, 2024, undoubtedly reflects a strategic marketing move. The combination of exceptional craftsmanship, credible actors, timely release, and provocative subject matter creates a recipe for social media content that is both successful and viral. In essence, there’s nothing particularly surprising or extraordinary about “Dirty Vote” except for the level of bravery exhibited by Dandhy Laksono and his team, along with Bibip, Feri, and Ucenk—who, pardon my bluntness, have risen slightly above the norm this time. Therefore, the response to it should ideally be cool-headed rather than reactive, especially from Candidate 02’s camp.
Why Just Slightly Above Average?
The issue of electoral fraud, particularly in the 2024 Presidential Election, has already become a widely discussed topic with a much harsher tone and rhetoric. Take, for instance, the recent actions of coalition NGOs reporting allegations of maladministration in the purchase of ex-military aircraft by the Ministry of Defense to the Ombudsman, which has now been officially submitted to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). The potential dangers and the risk of physical and criminal repercussions are even greater due to the lesser media coverage and public attention compared to “Dirty Vote.”
Ensuring Public Protection
I recently spoke with my friend Ucenk, also known as Zainal Arifin Mochtar, who is also a Senior Advisor at INTEGRITY Law Firm. I expressed my confidence that they would be relatively safe due to public protection measures. News of reports being filed with the Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu) and the Police by some supporters of Prabowo-Gibran might actually fuel greater resistance sentiments—besides serving as effective free advertising for “Dirty Vote” itself.
Navigating Legal Challenges
Having personally experienced the risks of advocating for public issues, I understand the challenges firsthand. However, not everyone enjoys the same level of public protection. For nearly nine years now, I have been facing allegations related to online passport payments, stemming from my opposition to Budi Gunawan’s candidacy for Chief of Police—despite him now serving as the longest-serving Head of the National Intelligence Agency (BIN). My colleagues at the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) who were initially implicated, such as Abraham Samad, Bambang Widjajanto, and Novel Baswedan, have long been released from the legal entanglements that have plagued me. There are many other risks involved, but they won’t be discussed here to keep the focus on the broader issue. The point is, I believe the advocates of “Dirty Vote” will remain safe as long as there is public protection, something that, in my experience, is rare.
The Danger of Rejecting the 2024 Election Results
One of the main concerns stemming from the criticisms directed towards President Jokowi’s actions during the 2024 Presidential Election is the potential rejection of the election results. While many are adopting a “wait and see” approach, anticipating the outcome of the upcoming vote on February 14, there is a real risk of widespread rejection if Candidate 02 wins in the first round. The mechanisms for contesting results through the Constitutional Court (MK) may be available, but given the recent scandal involving the court’s decision on Gibran’s case, the court’s credibility remains in question. This uncertainty could exacerbate tensions and potentially lead to conflict if not properly addressed.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the film “Dirty Vote” serves as a crucial piece in the ongoing discourse surrounding the 2024 Presidential Election and electoral integrity in Indonesia. While it may have arrived somewhat belatedly, its significance cannot be overlooked. As we navigate through these turbulent times, it’s essential to engage in constructive dialogue and ensure the protection of those advocating for transparency and accountability. Ultimately, it’s better to address issues late than never at all. Let us hope for a future where the democratic process in Indonesia is upheld with integrity and fairness for all.